Kevin Toh (UCL): The Geometry of Legal Thought

Event date
23 January 2025
Event time
17:00 - 18:45
Oxford week
HT 1
Audience
Anyone
Venue
Massey Room - Balliol College
Speaker(s)

Kevin Toh (UCL)

Kevin Toh, is Professor of Philosophy of Law at University College, London, and will be presenting the first paper of Hilary Term: "The Geometry of Legal Thought".

This seminar takes place in Massey Room, at Balliol College, University of Oxford (Broad St, Oxford OX1 3BJ) at 5:00pm on Thursday 23 January.

Abstract:

The paper is aimed at taking some steps towards a new theory of the nature of law that takes seriously the role of legal examples or exemplars as constituents of the law of any legal system.  There are two subsidiary goals.  In her recent book Rules (2022), a wide-ranging history of rules in general, the historian of science Lorraine Daston observes that nothing is more humdrum than our reasoning “from exemplum to example, from paradigm to particular”, but then remarks:  “The mystery is not that we do it but how we do it. . . .  [H]ow is it possible to follow [an example] . . . without being able to analyze that ability into explicit steps like the rule for finding the square root of a given number?”  One subsidiary goal of the lecture is to explain the nature of examples in such a way as to show how we reason based on them.  The second subsidiary goal is to understand the interplay between, and the co-evolution of, rules and examples in legal systems.  This goal is prompted by Edward Levi’s observation, in his seminal An Introduction to Legal Reasoning (1949), that judges will sometimes try to rise above making decisions based on similarities and differences between particular cases, and will attempt to articulate rules.  Some such attempts may succeed, whereas others will fail.  Either way, according to Levi, rules never entirely replace the relations of similarity and difference between legal examples.  At the same time, he observes, the rules themselves affect the ways that examples figure in judges’ subsequent reasoning.  My explanation of legal examples is aimed at making sense of such phenomena in an integrated way.  In pursuing both subsidiary goals, I rely on conceiving examples as points located in multi-dimensional topological spaces, and the dimensions of such spaces as assigning properties to the examples and specifying relations among them.

This event is open to anyone. No registration needed.

Pre-reading is desirable and strongly suggested, but not a requirement to attend.

If you want to receive the papers we discuss in our seminars join our mailing list by sending a blank email at jurisprudence-discussion-group-subscribe[at]maillist.ox.ac.uk.

Found within

Jurisprudence